Tuesday, October 1, 2019

Part I: Why We Need Stronger Cell Phone Radiation Regulations--Key Testimony Submitted to the FCC

On August 8, 2019, the FCC published a news release in which Ajit Pai, the FCC chairperson, issued a proposal that the FCC not change its existing radiofrequency (RF) exposure limits. He also proposed to gather public comment on rules to determine compliance with the exposure limits and establish uniform guidelines to ensure compliance.

The press release makes the following claims:
“The FCC sets radiofrequency limits in close consultation with the FDA and other health agencies. After a thorough review of the record and consultation with these agencies, we find it appropriate to maintain the existing radiofrequency limits, which are among the most stringent in the world for cell phones,” said Julius Knapp, chief of the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology.
As Jeffrey Shuren, Director of the Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, wrote to the FCC, “[t]he available scientific evidence to date does not support adverse health effects in humans due to exposures at or under the current limits…” and “[n]o changes to the current standards are warranted at this time.”
Unfortunately, these assertions do not reflect the state of the scientific literature regarding RF health effects, nor do they adequately reflect the public comment received by the FCC over the past six years regarding RF exposure limits for Proceeding Number 13-84.

The FCC has no health expertise and relies upon Federal health agencies, especially the FDA, for advice about RF exposure limits. However, these agencies have lacked the requisite expertise to provide this guidance as their RF health experts retired or took industry jobs. In the past decade, these agencies have failed to monitor the vast and growing body of peer-reviewed research that documents adverse health effects from low-intensity exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Rather, the Federal government has increasingly relied upon advice from engineers and scientists with conflicts of interest and industry lobbyists.

Following is an index of key submissions to the FCC regarding RF exposure limits and RF health effects since mid-2012.

October 1, 2019 

 Selected FCC Submissions re: 

"Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency 
Exposure Limits and Policies" (Proceeding Number 13-84)

Part I: Key Testimony Submitted to the FCC

 Last revision: October 1, 2019
The FCC received more than 1,200 submissions regarding its cell phone radiation regulations. These documents reveal what we know about wireless radiation health effects, and why we need to strengthen regulations and provide precautionary warnings to the public.
In response to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) request for input regarding its radiofrequency radiation regulations adopted in 1996, individuals and organizations submitted thousands of documents, testimonials, research papers and scientific publications that are now available to the public. 
These documents reveal what we know about wireless radiation health effects, and why we need to strengthen regulations and provide precautionary warnings to consumers.

Although more than fifteen countries have issued precautionary health warnings about cell phone radiation and recommendations about how to reduce risks, the wireless industry in the U.S. has opposed precautionary warnings and wants to weaken cell phone radiation standards.
In all, the FCC received more than 1,200 submissions between June 25, 2012 and October 1, 2019. Many submissions include multiple documents. The preponderance of submissions call on the FCC to adopt stronger exposure limits on radiofrequency radiation.
Hundreds of individuals submitted statements that document their personal health problems and diseases experienced from exposure to radiofrequency radiation. These and other submissions can be viewed or downloaded by clicking on Proceeding Number 13-84 on the FCC web site.
The FCC's obsolete RF exposure limits are 23 years old. The current request for public input is six years old. The FCC never reported on or acted upon a similar request for public input issued in 2003.
In 2015, a Harvard publication exposed how industry captured the FCC, "As a captured agency, the FCC is a prime example of institutional corruption. Officials in such institutions do not need to receive envelopes bulging with cash. But even their most well-intentioned efforts are often overwhelmed by a system that favors powerful private influences, typically at the expense of public interest."
Obviously, updating RF regulations and testing procedures has not been a priority for the FCC even though the U.S. General Accountability Office recommended this in 2012.
Although there is a search engine on the FCC web site, one cannot easily find important documents. Hence, I constructed several indices.
Part I which appears below contains key submissions to the FCC regarding cell phone radiation and its health effects, and cell phone testing procedures and regulatory standards.

The submissions are organized under the following categories:

(1) Scientific Expert Resolutions Calling for Stronger Regulations
(2) Expert Comments in Support of Stronger Regulations
(3) Expert Comments that Support Weaker Regulations
(4) Consumer, Environmental and Health Organizations
(5) Government Agencies
(6) Wireless Industry Corporations and Associations
(7) Miscellaneous Other 
Not indexed below are submissions from individuals without organizational or institutional affiliations.  Many of these submissions discuss electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).
Part II contains a list of key research papers that can be downloaded from the FCC web site. (updated Aug 11, 2019)
Part III lists 98 scientific experts from 23 nations who have signed resolutions between 2002 and 2014 that call for stronger regulations on wireless radiation, especially cell phone radiation.
In 2015, scientists who published peer-reviewed research on the health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) submitted a petition to the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and all world leaders calling for stronger regulations on exposure to radiofrequency radiation than current national and international exposure limits allow. The International EMF Scientist Appeal was also submitted to the FCC.
The Appeal has been signed by more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on electromagnetic fields and biology and health. These scientists representing 42 nations have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals. This petition was recently submitted to the United Nations Environment Programme. 

Scientific Expert Resolutions Calling for Stronger Regulations  
Catania Resolution (2002; 16 signees)

 Benevento Resolution (2006; 52 signees)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941320
Seletun Scientific Panel (2009); 7 signees)
Health Canada Safety Code 6 Declaration  (Jul 9, 2014; 54 signees)
The International EMF Scientist Appeal (May 11, 2015; 200 signees)
The International EMF Scientist Appeal (Aug 25, 2019; 250 signees)
The 5G Appeal (2017 moratorium; signed by 245 scientists and doctors)
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1040566847805/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf

Expert Comments in Support of Stronger Regulations
Omer Abid, MD, MPH
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520942005

David Adams, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017467594
Norm Alster ("FCC captured agency")
http://bit.ly/FCCcapturedagency
Frank Barnes, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520922935

Igor Belyaev, DrSc
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521098239 

BioInitiative Working Group (29 contributing authors)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521097953
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/111701910403/17111608-1.pdf
Martin Blank, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940937
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1092868197238/5%20-%20Attachment%205%20-%20Martin%20Blank%20PhD%20-%20Opposition%20Statement%20-%20File%2013-0953.pdf
David O. Carpenter, MD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940947
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311622

Neil Cherry, PhD
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1092868197238/4%20-%20Attachment%204%20-%20Olle%20Johansson%20PhD%20-%20Opposition%20Statement%20-%20File%2013-0953.pdf
Richard H. Conrad, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940952
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958477
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017466873

Devra L. Davis, PhD, MPH
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520943931
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10913128473042/The%20Miseducation%20of%20Britain%20on%205G%3A%20the%20Guardian%20Also%20Gets%20it%20Spectacularly%20Wrong.pdf
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10913128473042/The%20Miseducation%20of%20America%20on%205G_%20The%20New%20York%20Times%20Gets%20It%20Spectacularly%20Wrong.pdf
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1091340619273/FCC%20needs%20to%20update%20tests%20for%20radiofrequency%20radiation%20-%20North.pdf
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1091340619273/5G_%20The%20Unreported%20Global%20Threat%20-%20The%20Startup%20-%20Medium.pdf
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1091340619273/Pending%20Government%20Immunity%20for%20Telecoms%20Uninsurable%205G%20Network_.pdf
Devra Davis PhD MPH, Alvaro de Salles PhD, Susan Downs MD, Gunnar Heuser MD PhD, Anthony Miller MD. Lloyd Morgan BSEE, Yael Stein MD. Elihu Richter MD MPH (rebuttal of CTIA's claims)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958286

Alan H. Frey
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311549

Om Gandhi, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311471
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941429 
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520945322

Livio Giulani, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941522

Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940944
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521098235

Martha Herbert, MD, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940748
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1070786836035/MarthaHerberttoMCPS2015.pdf 
Isaac Jamieson, PhD
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10930270536460/IAJ_comments_to_FFC_Sep_30_2016.pdf
Toril Jeter, MD, FAACP
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958097 
Olle Johansson, PhD
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7022311370.pdfhttps://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1092868197238/4%20-%20Attachment%204%20-%20Olle%20Johansson%20PhD%20-%20Opposition%20Statement%20-%20File%2013-0953.pdf
Suleyman Kaplan, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941388
Henry C. Lai, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311466
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941777

Victor Leach / Simon Turner   
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941511
 
Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940946

B. Blake Levitt
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311465

De-Kun Li, MD, PhD, MPH
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940945
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311506

James C. Lin, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520929860

Richard Meltzer, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520942045
Don Maisch, PhD
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7022311348.pdf
Lloyd Morgan, BSEE
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940949

Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311233
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60002030879
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60002031262
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/60002031262.
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1082955067871
Martin Pall, PhD
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1092725512546
Jerry L. Phillips, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940948
Ronald M. Powell, PhD
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1070786836035/Message%20to%20Public%20Schools%20about%20Wireless%20Devices.pdfhttps://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1083040514650/The%20Health%20Argument%20against%20Cell%20Phones%20and%20Cell%20Towers.pdf
William J. Rea, MD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940950
Cindy Lee Russell, MD
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1001076789440
Cindy Sage, Lennart Hardell, MD & Martha Herbert, MD, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940054

Cindy Sage & David O. Carpenter, MD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520939954

J. Bertel Schou, PhD & Diane Schou, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941741
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941739

Miriam D. Weber, MD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941798

Grace Ziem, MD, MPH, DrPH
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520943726

Expert Comments that Support Weaker Regulations
Joe A. Elder, PhD
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940630

Consumer, Environmental and Health Organizations
American Academy of Pediatrics
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941318

American Academy of Environmental Medicine
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941435
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311618

California Brain Tumor Association
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311188
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521095455 

Center for Electrosmog Prevention
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311617

Consumers for Safe Cell Phones
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941456

Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Inc.
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941597
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941599
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941600
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941601
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941602
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311420
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941598
EMF Safety Network
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940957
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940667

EMRadiation Policy Institute
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940746
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940765
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940766
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940775
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958408
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940751
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311266

Environmental Health Trust
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311561
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10512278328322/Ex%20Parte-Pai%20051017.pdf
Environmental Working Group
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958411
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941812
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=752094148
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001040810
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001040811
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001040813
Environmental Working Group (petition w/ 26,000 signatures):
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941684
Global Union Against Radiation Deployment from Space http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001390648
Gust Environmental
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520939117

Pharmacists Planning Service Inc (PPSI)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958027
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958028

Stop Smart Meters
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311496
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940953
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941863

Smart Meters Irvine
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022125039

Stop Smart Meters New York
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941985

Wireless Education Action
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311599


Government Agencies

Cities of Boston, Massachusetts and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
http://bit.ly/1kAYSu7
Environmental Protection Agency
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7520941527.pdf
FCC Office of the Chairman (Response to Sen. Blumenthal & Rep. Eshoo)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001353996
FCC Office of Engineering Technology Bureau
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022136643http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520936584https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10809296013805/13-84.pdf https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10809189809418/13-84b.pdfhttps://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1080943159446/13-84c.pdfhttps://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1032547831999/TIA-MWF%20Notice%20of%20Ex%20Parte%20for%20OET-Labs%20Meeting.pdf
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10815418118189/13-84.pdf
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7022311620

Los Angeles Unified School District
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940749

Town of Hillsborough, California
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941733
Montgomery County, Maryland
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10512278328322/Ex%20Parte-Pai%20051017.pdf 
National Cancer Institute & National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/7521123438.pdf 
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941598

City of Portland, Oregon
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940265
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958232

City and County of San Francisco
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view.action?id=7520955358
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view.action?id=7520955359

Radiation Protection Division, Environmental Protection Agency
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941527
Radiofrequency Interagency Working Group (Federal)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941598
City of Tucson and County of Pima, Arizona Resolution
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941603

U.S. Department of Labor
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10612045456038/03-137.pdf

Wireless Industry Corporations and Associations

Alarm Industry Communications Committee
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958406

ARRL, the National Association for Amateur Radio
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941424

Art-Fi
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520925904
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520925905

Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941926

AT&T Services
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958353

Blooston Private Users
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941789

Cohen, Dippell and Everist, P.C
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941555

Consumer Electronics Association
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941397

CTIA--The Wireless Association
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941701
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520943091
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958337
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60001040407 (290 pp. SCENIHR Report)
Fixed Wireless Communications Coalition
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941477

GSM Association
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940433

IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940730 
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958056
Medtronic Inc
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941474
MMWave Coalition
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1081078030685/Docket%2013-84%20mmWC%20%20FINAL.pdf 
Mobile Manufacturers Forum
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941304
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958167

Mobile and Wireless Forum
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1090761539707/MWF%20ExParte_re_RFStandards.pdf
Momentum Dynamics Corporation and Oak Ridge National Laboratory
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941870
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958491

Motorola Solutions
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941479

National Association of Broadcasters
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941561

National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941659
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958184

Nokia
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940886

PCIA-The Wireless Infrastructure Association and The HetNet Forum
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941685
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958415

Qualcomm, Inc.
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520961187
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958390

RF Check Inc.
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521092619 
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000971924
Sensormatic Electronics, LLC
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958377
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941715 

Telecommunications Industry Association
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941840
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958447
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000974727
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1032547831999/TIA-MWF%20PowerPoint%20for%20FCC%20Labs%20and%20OET%20Meeting.pdf
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1032547831999/TIA-MWF%20Notice%20of%20Ex%20Parte%20for%20OET-Labs%20Meeting.pdf
Richard Tell Associates
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940058

Verizon and Verizon Wireless
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941587 
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958354
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/106151315125466/2018%2006%2015%20Verizon%20Ex%20Parte.pdf
Wi-Fi Alliance
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941621
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958320
           

Miscellaneous Other

American Association for Justice
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017466603
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520942173
Austrian Medical Association
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10929117005596/48-Attachment%2048-%20Austrian%20Medical%20Assoc%20Guideline%20EMF%20Disease.pdf 
California Medical Association
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1092989731923/30-Attachment%2030-%20California%20Medical%20Association%20Resolution.pdf
Council of Europe - Resolution 1815
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/109271312500258/1-Attachment%201%20-%20COUNCIL%20OF%20EUROPE%202011.pdf
Senator Bill Galvano (Florida)
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520940383
Green Swan, Inc.
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520941846
National Assn. of Telecommunications Officers, National League of Cities, National Assn of Counties, & U.S. Conference of Mayors
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/100252268811/Joint%20letter%20re%20RF%20to%20FCC%20NACo%20Final.pdf
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1062194009350/Wireless%20Bureau%20Ex%20Parte%20061918.pdf
North America's Building Trade Unions
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001483296http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001328468https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/60001514689.pdf
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)