Monday, November 11, 2013

Researcher Establishes Archive for Cell Phone Industry Whistleblowers

Wearing Your Smartphone – Not Too Smart?

Mark Scheerer, Public News Service, Nov 11, 2013

Download audio


PHOTO: Google Glass (above), although not yet available to the general public, joins smart watches, wrist phones and all kinds of wearable cell phones and digital devices as highly desirable consumer products with the approach of the holiday season. Scientists are issuing health warnings, however. Courtesy Wikipedia.org.

PHOTO: Google Glass (above), although not yet available to the general public, joins smart watches, wrist phones and all kinds of wearable cell phones and digital devices as highly desirable consumer products with the approach of the holiday season. Scientists are issuing health warnings, however. Courtesy Wikipedia.org. 
 
NEW YORK - Wearable phones and computers are on loads of shopping lists as the holiday season approaches, but scientists are warning that research indicates they present likely health risks - especially from cell-phone radiation.


Dr. David Gultekin, a research physicist at New York's Memorial Sloane-Kettering Cancer Center, showed that cell-phone radiation creates hot spots in human brains - a troublesome finding. Dr. Hugh Taylor, chairman of the obstetrics and gynecology at the Yale University School of Medicine, exposed pregnant mice to close-up cell-phone signals and observed the offspring behaving like children with attention deficit disorder.

"I think all these radiation-emitting technologies deserve a proper evaluation that includes not only exposure to adults but what happens to the fetus, the most vulnerable stage of life," Taylor said.

Many scientists question the accuracy of industry-funded research. They say money for government and foundation-funded research is scarce, and that when they report on the evidence of risk, the mainstream media - like those lab mice - have a short attention span.


Dr. Martin Blank, retired associate professor of physiology and cellular biophysics at Columbia University and a DNA expert, said research like that which found the DNA of mice altered by cell-phone exposure is more than enough to prompt action.
"When you get a situation where a problem arises, you invoke what's known as the precautionary principle," he said. "You take a certain amount of precaution as a result of a risk that has been identified."

 

Gultekin said wearable gadgets are brought to the marketplace with little concern for safety.
 

"When they're designing and developing a new product and introducing it, very rarely the health aspects of it is mentioned, or not mentioned at all," he said.
 

Advocates recommend keeping cell phones and other devices away from sensitive body parts and especially caution pregnant women against holding cell phones near their abdomens or in handbags carried near their bodies.
 

Just as the lies about the health threats from cigarettes were eventually exposed by someone from inside the tobacco industry, Dr. Joel Moskowitz, director of the Center for Family and Community Health at the University of California-Berkeley School of Public Health, said he hopes the same will happen regarding the risks of electromagnetic fields.
 

"I've been waiting for a whistle-blower for the last five years since I've been involved in this issue, but haven't had any forthcoming, unfortunately," he said. "But if you know of any whistle-blowers and they want to send me documents, I can assure that they will be protected."
 

An educational forum for the public will bring together many of the leading experts on electromagnetic fields on Friday at the New York Open Center in New York City. More information is online at electromagnetichealth.org.


http://bit.ly/1iZzFsD

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Why the FCC Must Strengthen Radiofrequency Radiation Limits in the U.S.



Why the FCC Must Strengthen Radiofrequency Radiation Limits in the U.S.

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health
The UC Berkeley Prevention Research Center
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley

November 5, 2013

Submitted to the Federal Communications Commission
re: Proceeding Number 13-84.

The complete document (115 pp.) is available at: http://bit.ly/1bWfTLP


Since 2009, when my colleagues and I published a review of the research on mobile phone use and tumor risk in the Journal of Clinical Oncology1, I have advocated for stronger radiofrequency radiation limits that adequately protect children and adults from non-thermal as well as thermal health risks. Wireless devices must be tested in a manner that resembles how consumers actually use them, and the wireless industry should be required to provide to consumers meaningful disclosure of health risks and ways to reduce harm without pre-empting the rights of localities to require additional disclosures.

The paper is a compilation of press releases I have prepared since April, 2012, along with selected news articles related to these releases. These materials summarize the latest health research on wireless radiation and related public health policy developments.

1 Myung SK, Ju W, McDonnell DD, Lee YJ, Kazinets G, Cheng CT, Moskowitz JM. Mobile phone use and risk of tumors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 27(33):5565-5572. 2009.


Page
No.              Table of Contents


Overview

3
Cellphones and Health

7
Cellphone Radiation and Health: References and Further Reading


Federal Communications Commission & Government Accountability Office

10
Does The FCC Plan To Rubber Stamp Outdated Cell Phone Radiation Standards?

12
Better Late Than Never?  FCC to Review Cell Phone Radiation Standards

14
Did Tom Wheeler, Nominee for FCC Chair,
Subvert Research Showing Harm From Cell Phone Radiation?

15
What's Wrong with the GAO Report on Cell Phone Radiation?


Brain Tumor Risk

16
WHO Monograph on Cancer Risk from Mobile Phone Use Released

17
Most Significant Government Health Report on Mobile Phone Radiation Ever Published

18
Brain Cancer Risk Increases with the Amount of Wireless Phone Use

22
Cell Phone Use, Acoustic Neuroma and Cancer of the Pituitary Gland

24
U.K. Cell Phone Study Points to Acoustic Neuroma, Not Brain Cancer Risk;
Fourth Study To Show Tumor Link

26
Studies Show Cell Phone Use Increases Brain Cancer Risk

29
Your Cell Phone Company May Affect Your Risk of Brain Cancer

32
Cellphones Can Increase Brain Cancer Risk in Children | "Scientists Challenge No Risk Conclusion"

34
Cell Phones and Cancer: Critics Say Kids Risk Brain Tumors

36
A close call: Why the jury is still out on mobile phones

41
'The biggest experiment of our species': With five billion mobile users in the world,
conference calls for research into potential brain cancer risk

44
Radiation from mobile phones: Tumour rumours return

48
The Million Women Study … shoddy design … shoddy results … shoddy conclusions


Sperm Damage and Male Infertility

52
Cell Phone Radiation Damages Sperm

54
Cell phones may damage sperm, health advocacy group says

56
Cell Phone Radiation, Pregnancy, and Sperm


Domestic Governmental Actions

57
Big Week for Cell Phone Radiation Legislation

58
San Francisco’s Cell Phone Fact Sheet is Factual

60
San Francisco Updates Cell Phone Safety Warnings

64
Florida City Adopts Cell Phone Precautionary Health Warnings


Global Governmental Actions and Major Reports

67
Call for Action to Reduce Harm from Mobile Phone Radiation
 (European Environment Agency Report)

69
Belgium Adopts New Regulations to Promote Cell Phone Radiation Safety

71
French Health Agency Recommends Children and Vulnerable Groups Reduce Cell Phone Radiation Exposure

73
India Adopts Health Warnings & U.S. Mobile Phone Standards

77
Russian Cell Phone Standards Offer Better Protection than American Standards

79
Italian Supreme Court Rules Cell Phones Can Cause Cancer: What are the implications of this ruling for the United States?


Smart Meters and Wi-Fi

81
Smart Meters: Correcting the Gross Misinformation

86
Health Experts Caution About Smart Meters

88
Adoption of Wi-Fi in Los Angeles USD Classrooms

90
Wireless Industry's Patented System to Reduce Cancer Risk from Wireless Local Networks Never Adopted

91
Boeing Tests In-Flight Wireless on Potatoes, Not People


Miscellaneous

92
Children's Cell Phone Use May Increase Their Risk of ADHD

95
Secondhand Exposure to Cell Phone Radiation: An Emerging Public Health Problem?

98
LTE Cell Phone Radiation Affects Brain Activity in Cell Phone Users (4G)

101
Samsung Scores with Lowest Radiation Cell Phones: Why Samsung Phones are a "Win-Win"

104
Comments on the 2012 GAO Report: “Exposure and Testing Requirements for Mobile Phones Should be Assessed” (Aug. 24, 2012 revision)




               
http://bit.ly/1bWfTLP

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Cellphones and Health



Cellphones and Health by Dr. Joel Moskowitz

Reprinted from TheGreenGazette, Sept/Oct 2013 issue, pp. 8-9

In the last issue we explored the potential hazards of electromagnetic radiation from iPad use. We learned about warnings from the European parliaments and doctors' associations in various countries, and discussed the differences between pulsed digital wireless signals and continuous analogue radio waves. This time we are pleased to invite Dr. Joel Moskowitz to share his research findings regarding the health effects of cellphones. 

I started studying the effects of cellphone radiation when Dr. Seung-Kwon Myung, a physician and epidemiologist from the National Cancer Center of South Korea, spent a year working in my center at UC Berkeley. He specializes in meta-analysis, a method by which data are combined across studies to generate more robust conclusions.  

My colleagues and I reviewed research that examined the association between cellphone use and tumor risk. When we grouped the 23 studies based upon quality of the research, we found strong group differences. In the 13 studies which failed to meet scientific best practices, we found what appeared to be reduced tumor risk. The 10 higher-quality studies found a harmful association between cellphone use and tumor risk. Also, the higher quality studies had no funding from the cellular industry whereas the lower quality studies had at least partial industry funding.

Since our study was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2009, I have reviewed hundreds of cellphone radiation studies. There is evidence that cellphone radiation may damage sperm and increase male infertility, increase risk of reproductive health problems, increase brain glucose metabolism, and alter EEG readings.

Many individuals have reported developing a sensitivity to cellphone radiation and other forms of radiofrequency energy.  They experience various allergic symptoms which may include ringing in their ears, headaches, dizziness, an irregular heartbeat, and memory and sleep problems. This condition, known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity, is considered a functional impairment in Sweden. The incidence of this condition, which is not easily diagnosed, appears to be increasing in many countries with the proliferation of “electrosmog.”

We need more research on the short-term and long term risks; risks to children and adolescents who are more vulnerable; reproductive health risks, and risks of newer technologies. We need to better understand the mechanisms that contribute to health effects and how to reduce the risks. Many scientists believe that there are mechanisms other than “heat” at work. Currently, the regulations adopted by most governments, including Canada and the U.S., only address the heating effect produced by cellphone radiation. They completely ignore biologic reactivity.

Cellphone and Brain Tumour Risk

It's premature to estimate long-term tumor risk because tumors can take several decades to develop. A few studies suggest that the risk of glioma, a serious and often deadly brain tumor, doubles after 10 years of cellphone use. This could amount to an additional 10,000 cases per year in the U.S.

Many people have come to rely on their cellphones over land lines, and many children start using cellphones at a young age, so we may see increased risk in the future. On the other hand, changes in the pattern of use (e.g. hands-free, texting) can reduce health risks. Also, technology is changing; yet we don't know if newer technologies are safer or more harmful. It is difficult for scientific research about long-term effects to keep up with the speed at which companies bring forth new consumer radiofrequency microwave devices. This behooves us to practice precaution.

Cellphone Radiation Damages Sperm

On June 28, 2012, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) reported: “EWG scientists have analyzed 10 scientific studies documenting evidence that cellphone radiation exposure leads to slower, fewer and shorter-lived sperm. The research raises concerns for men who carry their phones on their belts or in pants pockets. This conclusion is supported by a review paper recently published in the Journal of Andrology:

 “The results showed that human spermatozoa exposed to RF-EMR (radio frequency electromagnetic radiation) have decreased motility, morphometric abnormalities, and increased oxidative stress, whereas men using mobile phones have decreased sperm concentration, decreased motility (particularly rapid progressive motility), normal morphology, and decreased viability. These abnormalities seem to be directly related to the duration of mobile phone use.” (La Vignera et al, 2012). 
Infertility has become a mounting problem in America and Canada. According to Statistics Canada, infertility in Canada has almost doubled between 1992 and 2010, not just among couples who got married older, but also among younger couples in their 20's.  

Cellphone Radiation, Pregnancy and Children

The latest, peer-reviewed science finds prenatal cellphone radiation exposure damages test mammals' offspring. Several new, independent studies confirm previous research that pulsed digital signals from cellphones disrupt DNA, impair brain function, and damage sperm. 

Many studies have found that exposure to low-intensity cellphone radiation can open the blood-brain barrier. This can enable toxins in the blood to penetrate the brain. A recent study found that children who used cellphones were more likely to exhibit ADHD (attention-deficit hyperactivity) symptoms than children who did not use them, but this effect was observed only among children who used cellphones who had slightly elevated lead levels in their blood. Moreover, in the children with some lead in their blood, the more they used their cellphones, the more likely they had ADHD symptoms.

On December 12, 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics sent a letter to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requesting reassessment of cellphone exposure limits:

“Children are disproportionately affected...The differences in bone density and the amount of fluid in a child’s brain compared to an adult’s brain could allow children to absorb greater quantities of RF (radiofrequency) energy deeper into their brains than adults. It is essential that any new standards for cellphones or other wireless devices be based on protecting the youngest and most vulnerable populations to ensure they are safeguarded through their lifetimes.” 
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report last summer calling on the FCC to update cellphone exposure limits and testing requirements. The report noted that the testing requirements are inadequate as cellphones are being used closer to the head and body than the test requires. Thus, actual users' exposure to cellphone radiation may exceed the legal limit.

Are all Cellphones Equal with regards to Radiation?

The amount of cellphone radiation your phone emits depends on various factors, including your location and distance from cell towers. Some cellphones generate as much as eight times more radiation than others. A measurement, called the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate), is available on the internet for every cellphone, but this measures the maximum amount of radiation emitted, not the typical amount. You can't find out how much radiation a phone generates during average daily use, which may be more important in terms of cumulative health risk. Some low SAR phones may generate more radiation on average than high SAR phones. 

Your cellphone carrier also matters. One study shows that GSM phones can emit 28 times more radiation on average than CDMA phones. Another study shows GSM affects EEG readings more than CDMA. Your cellphone carrier determines which type of phone you have. In the U.S., people can choose to use a CDMA phone by selecting Verizon or Sprint; however, in Canada all carriers use GSM phones. Soon voice calls will use 4G technology, that is LTE, instead of GSM or CDMA.  More comparative studies on different carrier standards are needed, especially the newer standards.

Recommendations on Cellphone Usage

Although further research is needed, we cannot afford to wait for conclusive evidence. There are more than 300 million cellphones in use in the U.S. Two-thirds of children eight and older use them. The government's regulations are outmoded and need to be revised. About a dozen nations have issued precautionary health warnings. It is time to publicize practical ways in which people can minimize their personal health risk. In addition, I have recommended an annual assessment of $1 on each cellphone. In the U.S., this would generate $300 million annually for vitally needed research and education.

Here are some practical steps which cellphone users can easily adopt:
  • Keep your cellphone away from your body. Don't keep the phone near your head or reproductive organs whenever it is turned on. Don’t sleep with the phone near your bed. The amount of radiation is related to the square of the distance, so keeping your phone 10 inches away reduces your exposure 100-fold compared to an inch.
  • Use a corded headset or other hands-free method such as a speakerphone or text. Keep your calls short. 
  • Minimize cellphone use among children, teens, and pregnant women. A child’s brain absorbs twice as much radiation as an adult brain.
  • Don’t use your phone when the signal is weak, for example, on an elevator or in a moving vehicle, as the phone is designed to increase its signal strength to compensate.
  • When carrying a cellphone in your pocket: Keep the cellphone turned off, or deactivate its signals (i.e. keep it on airplane mode, plus turn off the WiFi and Bluetooth functions). Turn it on or activate it periodically to check for messages, or check for messages from a land line. The cellphone is designed to send signals to cell towers regularly to identify its location, whenever it's turned on. The WiFi antenna in a smartphone sends beacon signals continually if it's not turned off.
  • Demand that the government revise regulations, fund research, and issue precautionary health recommendations.
Dr. Joel Moskowitz is on the research faculty at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health. He has conducted research on chronic disease prevention and health promotion for more than 30 years, has authored dozens of peer-reviewed health publications, and is Director of UC Berkeley's Center for Family and Community Health.

Article References: http://bit.ly/14CkeFm
For more information, contact: Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., email: jmm@berkeley.edu; Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Website: http://www.saferemr.com/ or on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR.

For the online version of this magazine article including interesting graphics, see pages 8-9 of the Sept./Oct. issue of TheGreenGazette: http://bit.ly/18RXE7x


Dr. Joel Moskowitz: Cellphone Radiation and Health
References and Further Reading 

Myung SK, Ju W, McDonnell DD, Lee YJ, Kazinets G, Cheng CT, Moskowitz JM, Mobile phone use and risk of tumors: a meta-analysis, J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov x20;27(33):5565-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6366. Epub 2009 Oct 13.  http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/33/5565 

Byun Y-H, Ha M, Kwon H-J, Hong Y-C, Leem J-H, et al. (2013) Mobile Phone Use, Blood Lead Levels, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Symptoms in Children: A Longitudinal Study. PLoS ONE 8(3): e59742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059742. http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0059742  

S├╝leyman Kaplan, MD

Slides: Effects of prenatal and adult EMF exposure on brain development
http://www.healthandenvironment.org/uploads/docs/Cell_phone_and_neuron_health_November_11-11-2012_Short.pdf

Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus of rats: a stereological and histopathological study. Odaci, et al
http://www.healthandenvironment.org/uploads/docs/Odaci_Effects_of_prenatal_exp_to_a_MWR_on_brain_of_babies_2008.pdf
 
Nesrin Seyhan, PhD

Slides: Gazi non-ionizing radiation protection center and Gazi biophysics department

The effect of radiofrequency radiation on DNA and lipid damage in female and male infant rabbits. Guler, et al

Devra Davis, PhD, MPH

Slides: Cellphone toxicology, exposure assessment and epidemiology--an update

Slides: Expert forum: Cellphone radiation risk to prenancy and sperm

Cellphone safety: The right to know about gray matters, Devra Davis

Doctors' advice to patients and their families: Cellphones and Health: Simple precautions make sense, Environmental Health Trust

Igor Belyaev, PhD

Slides: Exposure to microwaves from mobile communication, DNA repair and cancer risk http://www.healthandenvironment.org/uploads/docs/2nd_2012_NPC_Belyaev_final.pdf

Role of physical and biological variables in bioeffects of non-thermal microwaves, Igor Belyaev http://www.healthandenvironment.org/uploads/docs/BelyaevePhysical_Bio_Variables_Bioeffets_10-23-12.pdf

Microwaves from mobile phones inhibit 53BP1 focus formation in human stem cells more strongly than in differentiated cells: Possible mechanistic link to cancer risk. Markova, et al
http://www.healthandenvironment.org/uploads/docs/Belyaev_Cellphones_Stem_Cells_with_Link_to_Cancer_3-10.pdf

Hugh Taylor, MD, PhD

Slides: Fetal cellphone exposure affects behavior
http://www.healthandenvironment.org/uploads/docs/Taylor_Fetal_Affects_from_Cellphone_Radiation_in_Mice_3-15-12.pdf

Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800-1900 Mhz-rated cellular telephones afets neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Aldad, et al

EHHI report: The cellphone problem, February 2012

EHHI cellphone report summary

Ronald Herberman, MD

Slides: Cellphone radiation risks--the case for precaution

Exposure limits: The underestimation of absorbed cellphone radiation, especially in children. Gandhi, et al

Dr. De-Kun Li, MD, PhD

Senior Research Scientist, Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute; Lecturer, Stanford University

A prospective study of in-utero exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of childhood obesity. Li, et al


Collaborative on Health and the Environment:
http://www.healthandenvironment.org/partnership_calls/11452?res

GAO Report:
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-771

Environmental Health Trust: 
http://ehtrust.org/

Environmental Working Group review of sperm damage research:
http://www.prlog.org/11911996

Dr. Dariusz Leszczynski's science blog on mobile phone radiation and health:
http://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/

Video (1 hour, 58 minutes): 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnn6gNyRU7g

Infertility rates rising for Canadian couples

BlackBerry: Keep Our Phones Away From Your Body

Environmental Working Group. Cellphone Radiation Damages Sperm, Studies Show. Jun 28, 2012

La Vignera et al. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. Journal of Andrology. 2012 May/June: 33(3):350-356. 

CNET Report: Cellphone use could reduce sperm count
Dong Ngo, August 18, 2011  (This article was reprinted on 105 news web sites in China, Indonesia, Romania, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and Vietnam.)